Beyond Buy-and-Hold #65
By Rob Bennett
In all areas of life endeavor outside of stock investing, the word “safe” has a similar meaning. A trampoline is “safe” if it does not cause injury or death to the kids who jump on it. A food is “safe” if it does not cause sickness. A driving speed is “safe” if it does not cause you to get in accidents. An action is described as “safe” when the chances of a devastating result are small.
That’s not how the word is employed in InvestoWorld.
What do you think it is that aspiring retirees are looking for when they enter “safe withdrawal rate” or “safe retirement” into a Google search engine? They are looking for information that will help them to know whether their retirement plan is almost sure to work. They don’t want to be taking chances on that. A failed retirement is a horrible life setback that they very much want to avoid.
The existing studies do not serve this purpose.
Read more »

We all know about the importance of investment diversification, especially it comes to retirement planning—today I’d like to focus another type of diversification, one that’s even broader in scope. It’s income diversification, and it could quite possibly be the most neglected part of retirement planning.
A few weeks ago I did a post on retirement from a different direction. In
If you’ve spent much time on this site, you know that I’ve taken aim at the assumption that homeownership is good for everyone. It’s not that I think owning a home is bad, but more that I don’t think it’s right for everyone. In addition, I think that the advancement of- and unquestioned belief in- universal homeownership was one of the root causes of the real estate and mortgage meltdown.
While nearly everyone in the industrialized world is practically fixated on the importance of a comfortable retirement, reality may be heading in a very different direction. A report from US News (via Yahoo! Finance) entitled 




